Freedom does not mean we can do whatever we want as long as nobody gets hurt- this leads to moral relativism, the false belief that there is no objective good or evil. Freedom does not mean all options are equal; nor that our actions do not have consequences. With freedom comes responsibility. God allows us to choose and expects that we will make good decisions.
What is the relationship between our moral (ethical) obligations and our freedom (or liberty)? What’s more important and compelling? Give some examples.
Our moral obligations and our freedom: Moral refers to what societies sanction as right and acceptable. Most people tend to act morally and follow societal guidelines. Also, Morality often requires that people sacrifice their own short-term interests for the benefit of society. … So, morals are the principles that guide individual conduct within society.
What does freedom mean to ordinary individuals? Also, Does it mean freedom of speech, expression, and choice? As a young democracy, India has to learn a lot more in terms of striking a balance between the rights of individuals and the overall good of society and the nation. One of the major political parties has called for a nation-wide strike to protest against an incident that has happened in one state. Another set of parties is scheduled to call a similar strike to protest against rising prices.
Many point out that “amorality” and “immorality,” though they may appear similar, have various differences. Some suggest reading Aesop’s Fables, The Dark Witch, To Kill a Mockingbird, etc.; to find moral values.
Also, frequently listed moral values include: acceptance; charity; compassion; cooperation; courage. Also, dependability; due regard to the feelings, rights, traditions and wishes of others; empathy; equality; fairness. Additionally, fidelity; forgiveness; generosity; giving pleasure; good sportsmanship; gratitude; hard work; humility. Lastly, integrity; justice; keeping promises; kindness; love; loyalty; not cheating and also, not hurting others.
The people most affected by such “forced stoppages of work” are also the most vulnerable sections of society – the daily wage earners, the small vendors, and the micro-entrepreneur. Is this an acceptable definition of freedom? The irony is that all this happens despite the highest court of the country having pronounced such strikes as illegal as they impinge on the rights of others.