.Judicial Process Discussion: The ratification of the judicial act of 1789 initiated the rise of the three court systems namely; the supreme, circuit, and district courts. The three courts serve justices acts to the public depending on the case level  Envisioning the absence of these courts today, America would have ended up becoming an unjust country. In other words, if the anti-federalists had won the debate, fewer judicial units serving the interest of the public would have prevailed.  Additionally, corruption would have been at its peak in the American government. Technically, courts are identified as different independent bodies in the government. Therefore, the act provides the courts with the power to limit government officials’ actions based on integrity grounds. It is therefore comprehensive that, the absence of these courts, particularly the Supreme Court, heavy looting and oppression by government executives. Additionally, other officials stealing would have been a common practice.

Discussion 2

The state courts are commonly famous and beneficial because of their jurisdiction executions, particularly the general jurisdiction (Judicial Process Discussion). However, the constitution grants congress the power of making uniform laws that inferiorities the state courts. Particularly in making certain jurisdiction which is general. For example, handling bankruptcy cases cannot be smoothly done by the state courts. Therefore a change of involving state court representatives can aid in the establishment of inclusive and uniform state laws.

Conclusion

Most of the current features in the court system are ideal in promoting justice to the country. For example, the state court serves plenty of local issues which leads to the better establishment of peace and equality in the country. Additionally, the category of trials and cases taken by the state courts under general jurisdiction eases the workloads of the higher courts. The workload ease enables the federal and supreme courts to concentrate on bigger cases that concern constitutional violations.